Showing posts with label Junk Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Junk Science. Show all posts

Friday, August 13, 2010

The EPA Must Be Stopped!

Alan Caruba

By Alan Caruba

On August 12, the Environmental Protection Agency sent out a press release, “EPA Proposes Rules on Clean Air Act Permitting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions”.

It is a frontal attack on the U.S. economy that is currently in the throes of a decline that has not been seen since the Great Depression.

If the EPA succeeds in this Big Lie, the provision of affordable energy in America will cease.

“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is proposing two rules to ensure that businesses planning to build new, large facilities or make major expansions to existing ones will be able to obtain Clean Air Act permits that address their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.”

The Clean Air Act does not cover carbon dioxide (CO2) which the EPA deems the primary GHG. This is because poses no threat to the environment and, indeed, is a vital and essential element of the environment insofar as all vegetation from a blade of grass to a giant Sequoia tree is dependent on it for growth.

Moreover, the proposed regulation of CO2 is based on the global warming fraud that says that it is responsible for a significant warming of the planet. There is not a scintilla of proof of this and, indeed, the Earth is presently in one of its natural cycles of cooling, not warming.

Thus, there is no scientific justification for the regulation of carbon dioxide no matter how many times the EPA says there is.

The EPA release says “projects that will increase CHG emissions substantially will require an air permit.”

If American industry, particularly the targeted “power plants and oil refineries”, are required to get GHG permits, it will put yet another huge sector of the nation’s economy under the thumb of the most insidious exponents of the global warming fraud, enemies of any economic growth.

“The Tailoring Rule covers large industrial facilities like power plants and oil refineries that are responsible for 70 percent of the GHGs from stationary sources,” says the EPA news release.

What it doesn’t say is that this power to regulate that does not exist in the present Clean Air Act.

It will cause electricity costs to skyrocket along with gasoline and all other oil derivatives. It will utterly wreck the U.S. economy that is already in dire straits.

If an invading nation had imposed these kinds of restrictions on Americans, we would be in the streets with guns and any other means to fight them.

There is NO global warming. Carbon dioxide plays NO role in this non-event.

This is regulation by deception, by lies, by the arrogance of environmentalists who view the human race as a cancer on the planet.

And, naturally, they have waited until Congress has gone on recess to “propose” this attack on the nation.

Take action! Contact your Representatives and Senators. Drown the White House in protests.

The EPA must be stopped!

© Alan Caruba, 2010   Alan Caruba blogs daily at Warning Signs . An author, business and science writer, he is the founder of National Anxiety Center.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Oh Dear, Two More Of Those You-Beaut Green Schemes

Andrew BoltBy Andrew Bolt

Yet another government-backed solar plant, this one in Queensland, flares out:

Cloncurry in the state’s northwest was meant to be the centrepiece of a radical $30 million plan to use solar energy to heat water and generate electricity, cutting carbon emissions and reliance on diesel – and eventually taking the town off the grid.

But The Courier-Mail can reveal that three years after its launch, instead of a forest of 8000 mirrors the project consists only of four test panels and a fake tower behind a locked gate.

It was forecast that by now, a “groundbreaking” 10-megawatt solar thermal power plant would be using steam from water heated in a graphite block to drive a turbine to generate electricity. It should have been supplying power to the homes of 4828 residents.

The Government, which faces criticism over a series of expensive infrastructure blunders, is blaming the project’s failure on concerns about light pollution.

Boffins are now looking into concerns that residents could be exposed to blinding light from the plant.

(Thanks to reader OWA.)

UPDATE

Then there’s another green seeming-not-doing cockup, yet again involving the green-preaching CSIRO - and big bills for consumers. This time it’s the three star ratings for the energy efficiency of houses that the Rudd Government has endorsed:

The three software tools—the first one was developed by Australia’s peak scientific body, the CSIRO—calculate a star rating based on the proposed fabric of the home (the bricks, timber, concrete, tin, insulation and other materials planned for the walls, floors and roofs)…

“So far I have found no correlation between star rating and energy consumption in the home,” says (Monica) Oliphant, immediate past president of the worldwide International Solar Energy Society (and adjunct associate professor at the University of South Australia)…

One of the enduring frustrations of scientists in this area is the ongoing rollout of new policies dedicated to energy efficiency before the accumulation of evidence to justify the policy in the first place. It is a significant shortcoming that was highlighted by the Productivity Commission five years ago after a public inquiry into energy efficiency.

Oliphant points to the federal government’s National Strategy on Energy Efficiency last year as an example of policy that has leaped ahead of evidence… The ... Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency is calling for the existing energy efficiency policy for all new homes (which scientists and Australia’s peak building groups say is fundamentally flawed) to be applied to all existing homes when they come up for sale or lease; and at some point in the future, a comprehensive study will determine whether any of it actually works.

According to Oliphant, ... the study, and the evidence, should come before the policy, not after it…

Another respected scientist in this field, the University of Adelaide’s associate professor Terry Williamson, puts it more bluntly: “Can we please just have some evidence-based policy? The only data in Australia in this area relates to a study of 40 houses and it shows absolutely no correlation between the energy star ratings and the actual energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. The policies and the department are just all over the place. It is a tale of mismanagement."…

(P)eak bodies including the Housing Industry Association and Master Builders have disclosed their studies showing serious problems with the accuracy of the software tools that calculate the star ratings.


Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

Profile:
Andrew writes for Melbourne's Herald Sun, Sydney's Daily Telegraph and Adelaide's Advertiser. He runs Australia's most-read political blog, and appears on Channel 9, ABC TV's Insiders and MTR 1377, 8am each weekday.


Saturday, March 28, 2009

Celebrate Human Achievement Hour

Instead of the Negative “Earth Hour” Hocus-pocus nonsense, Celebrate Human Achievement Hour.

Rejoice in the fact that your fellow human beings have mastered fire, created an agricultural world, built wondrous monuments, invented miraculous machines, and otherwise exercised their creative powers to make the world the great place it is today.

Turn ON your lights from 8:30 - 9:30 pm Tonight!


For some insight into this “Earth Hour” Farce see TonyfromOz's article The Earth Hour Fallacy

Also posting:

Cord Blomquist
and and many others.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

It's The Sun, Stupid

By Steven Milloy
When the international global warming alarm-ocracy gathers for its annual convention on the balmy island of Bali next week, is there any chance that the delegates will look up at the big yellow ball in the sky and ask, "Could it be the Sun, stupid?" New research suggests that would be a great question for them to consider...
Read the full column at

Read more enlightening articles from the here and read here.

Tagged: , , , ,

Political